Tag: copywriting

Most unhappy design projects were decided before any work started. The brief was thin, the designer filled the gaps with assumptions, and the first draft revealed that the two parties had different projects in mind.

I write this as the person on the other side of it. A good brief makes my job easier and yours cheaper, and almost nobody has been taught what one contains.

What a brief is actually for

It is not a specification of what to make. If you could specify that, you would not need a designer.

It is a description of the problem, the constraints, and how you will judge success. The designer’s job is to propose solutions within those boundaries. If you supply the solution, you have hired an operator rather than a designer, and you will get what you asked for rather than what you needed.

That distinction matters because a common failure is a business owner arriving with a fully formed picture in their head and a brief that describes it incompletely, then being disappointed that the result does not match a picture nobody else could see.

What to include

What the thing is for. Not “we need a new logo.” What is the actual problem? Are you being underestimated by prospects? Do your materials look inconsistent? Did the business change? The underlying problem often points to a different solution than the one you came in asking for, and a good designer should tell you so.

Who it is for. Specifically. Not “everyone” and not “adults 25 to 65.” Describe an actual customer. What they worry about, what they are comparing you against, what would make them hesitate.

Where it will be used. Every application you can think of. A logo that works on a website and fails on a van is a solved problem if somebody mentions the van at the start, and an expensive rework if they mention it at the end.

What already exists and is fixed. Colours you cannot change, a name, a typeface used elsewhere, brand elements from a parent company. Constraints given up front are useful. Constraints revealed at revision three are costly.

Examples of things you like, with reasons. The reasons matter more than the examples. “I like this because it feels calm and uncluttered” is usable. “I like this” is not, because I cannot tell whether you mean the colour, the type, the photography or the layout.

Examples of things you dislike, with reasons. Equally valuable and more rarely supplied. Knowing what is out of bounds saves everybody a round.

The real deadline. Not a padded one. If the actual date is the trade show in six weeks, say so, because it changes what is sensible to attempt.

The budget. More on this below.

Who approves it. If there is a business partner or a spouse whose opinion will decide this, they need to be involved at the start rather than appearing at the end with a different view. This single item prevents more wasted work than anything else on the list.

Say the budget

Business owners often withhold budget believing it prevents being charged the maximum. What it actually does is make it impossible to propose the right scope.

The same brief can be a two week job or a three month one. Without a figure, a designer is guessing which project you are describing, and a guess wrong in either direction wastes the conversation.

You do not need to name an exact number. A range is enough. “We are thinking somewhere in this region, tell us what is realistic” is a productive sentence and it usually produces an honest answer about what fits.

What to leave out

Solutions. “Make the logo blue with a swoosh.” If you know exactly what you want, you want production, not design, and you should say so and pay accordingly.

Adjectives with no anchor. Modern, clean, professional, fresh, elegant. Everybody uses these words and no two people mean the same thing. Show me an example instead.

Design instructions you do not have a reason for. “Make it bigger” is a solution. “It is not standing out enough against the competitors’ signs” is a problem, and it might be solved by size, contrast, or position.

Giving feedback that helps

The revision round is where most projects go wrong, and it is fixable with one habit.

Describe the problem, not the fix. “It feels too corporate for us” gives me something to work with. “Change the font to Helvetica” does not, because if the fix does not work we are both stuck.

Be concrete about what is wrong. “I do not like it” is honest and unusable. “It looks like a law firm and we are a bike shop” is immediately actionable.

Consolidate. Collect all feedback, from everyone whose opinion matters, into one message. Drip feeding contradictory notes over four days produces confusion and costs hours.

Separate taste from function. “I personally prefer green” is different from “green will not read against our building.” Both are legitimate, and knowing which one you are expressing helps enormously.

Say what is working. Not politeness. If I do not know which parts you want kept, I risk changing them in the next round.

The realistic expectation

The first draft is a proposal, not an attempt at the final thing. It exists to establish direction. Reacting to it as a failed final version creates unnecessary tension in a normal process.

Two or three rounds is typical. More than that usually means the brief was unclear or the approvers were not aligned at the start.

Some things you ask for will get pushed back on. A designer who agrees to everything is not doing the job. If I think a request will hurt the result I should say so once, clearly, and then do what you decide.

The short version

If you write nothing else, write these five things:

What problem are we solving. Who is it for. Where will it be used. What is fixed and cannot change. Who signs it off.

That is a usable brief in five sentences and it prevents most of what goes wrong.

The projects that disappoint people are almost never failures of skill. They are failures of shared understanding, decided in the first conversation, and discovered three weeks later.

Supplying the raw material

One practical thing that delays projects more than anything else: the content.

A designer cannot finish a website without your words and your photographs. Not placeholder text and stock images, the real ones. Projects routinely stall for weeks at this point because both sides assumed the other was handling it.

Decide explicitly, before work starts, who is writing the copy and who is supplying photography. If it is you, block time for it, because it will take longer than you think. If it is them, it should be in the quote.

The same applies to logins, brand assets, and access to your domain and hosting. Gather them at the start. Hunting for a hosting password three weeks in is a genuinely common cause of delay.

What to ask before you sign

Five questions that prevent most disputes.

What exactly is delivered? File formats, how many variations, whether source files are included. “A logo” means different things to different people.

How many revision rounds are included, and what happens after? So nobody is surprised by an additional invoice.

Who owns the work when it is done? Should be you, on final payment. Get it in writing.

What is the timeline, and what does it depend on? Most timelines assume you respond within a few days. Say so if you cannot.

What happens if I want a change in six months? Rates, availability, whether they retain your files.

None of these are adversarial. A professional will have ready answers and will be glad you asked, because these are exactly the questions whose absence causes trouble later.

The relationship worth having

The best design outcomes I have been part of came from clients who treated it as a collaboration rather than a transaction.

That means being honest about budget, responsive with feedback, clear about who decides, and willing to be pushed back on occasionally. It also means expecting the same in return: honest advice about what will and will not work, including when that costs the designer a bigger project.

If you find somebody who tells you that you do not need what you came in asking for, keep them. That advice is worth more than the work you were about to buy.

Briefing for smaller jobs

Not every project needs the full treatment. If you are asking for a flyer, a social template or a single page, the brief can be four lines and still prevent most problems.

What is it for and who sees it. Where and how it gets used, including the finished size and whether it is printed or on screen. What has to be on it, listed. When you need it.

That is enough for a small job. The failure on small jobs is almost never an inadequate brief in the sense of being too short. It is a missing constraint that only surfaces at the end, usually the final dimensions or the fact that it needs to work in black and white.

State the boring practical constraints first. They are the ones that cause rework.

---

This article contains no statistics and no pricing claims. Where numbers appear elsewhere on this site, they are measured with free public tools or cited to a named source.

Here is a caption that appears, in some form, on thousands of small business accounts every day.

“At [business name], we pride ourselves on delivering exceptional quality and outstanding customer service. Our dedicated team goes above and beyond to ensure every client is completely satisfied. Contact us today to learn more about how we can help you!”

Nobody talks like that. Nobody has ever talked like that. And the person who wrote it does not talk like that either, which is the strange part. They are perfectly capable of describing their work in plain language, and then they open the posting app and something happens.

What happens when the app opens

There is a specific transformation that occurs and it is worth naming, because you cannot fix it until you can see it.

Somebody who would happily tell you “yeah, that one was a nightmare, the previous guy had run the pipe through a joist” writes “Another successful project completed! Our expert team tackled this challenging job with professionalism.”

The interesting information got removed. The specific detail, the mild complaint, the actual story. What replaced it is a set of claims that cannot be checked and that every competitor makes identically.

I think this happens for two reasons. The first is that people are imitating what they have seen other businesses do, and other businesses were imitating the same thing, so the register propagates without anyone choosing it. The second is that writing publicly feels formal, and formality in most people’s hands means removing personality and specificity, which are precisely the two things that make writing worth reading.

Why the corporate voice fails

It is unverifiable. “Exceptional quality” is a claim with no evidence attached. A reader cannot evaluate it, so they discount it entirely. Everybody claims this. It carries no information.

It is identical to your competitors. Read three businesses in your category and the captions are interchangeable. If your writing could be copied and pasted onto a competitor’s account without anyone noticing, it is doing nothing for you.

It hides the interesting part. The story about the pipe through the joist is genuinely interesting. It shows diagnosis, it shows a real problem being solved, and it gives the reader something to picture. The corporate version has all of that surgically removed.

It makes you sound bigger and worse. Small businesses often adopt corporate language believing it makes them seem more professional. It mostly makes them seem generic, and it discards the actual advantage of being small, which is that a person is involved.

The fix, which is uncomfortably simple

Write the caption the way you would say it to somebody standing next to you looking at the same photo.

That is the whole technique. It sounds too simple to be useful and it is the entire thing.

Try it literally. Look at the photo, imagine a friend has just asked “what’s that?”, and type your answer. Do not edit it into something more professional afterwards. That editing step is where the damage happens.

“What’s that?”
“Rotted sill on a place over in the north end. Whole corner had gone soft because a gutter’s been overflowing into it for probably ten years. Cut it back to good wood and replaced about four feet.”

That is a complete caption. It is better than anything in the corporate register, it took twenty seconds, and it required no writing ability whatsoever.

The structure underneath

If you want something more explicit than “write how you talk,” most good captions do the same three things.

Say what it is. Plainly, in one line, so somebody scrolling understands the image immediately.

Add one piece of information. Why it happened, what it took, what was surprising, what to watch out for. This is the part that justifies the post existing.

Stop.

That third instruction is the one people ignore. There is a strong urge to append something: a call to action, a string of hashtags, an invitation to get in touch. Resist it most of the time. A post that simply shows good work and explains it does its job, and constant asking makes an account feel like a sales channel, which reduces how much anyone wants to look at it.

Things to cut

Adjectives about your own quality. Exceptional, outstanding, premium, top notch. Every one of these is you grading yourself, which readers correctly ignore. Show the work instead.

“We pride ourselves on.” Never necessary.

Exclamation marks in bulk. One is fine. Three in a caption reads as nervous.

Third person about yourself. “The team at Dave’s Roofing is pleased to announce.” You are Dave. Say “we” or “I.”

Hashtag walls. Thirty hashtags looks like spam to humans and does much less than people think. A few relevant ones, if any.

A call to action on every single post. Occasionally, when there is a real reason.

Things to add

Place names. “Over in the north end” is better than “a recent project.” Specificity makes it real and it quietly signals your service area.

Mild honesty about difficulty. “That one took longer than I expected” is disarming and human. Businesses are afraid this makes them look less competent. It does the opposite, because only somebody confident admits a job was hard.

The problem, not just the result. What was wrong is more interesting than what it looks like finished.

Actual numbers when you have them. “Four feet of sill” beats “a section of the sill.” Precision reads as competence.

Your own idioms. However you actually describe things. The regional phrase, the trade slang. This is the part that cannot be copied by a competitor.

On voice consistency

You will read advice about developing a brand voice, with documents and adjectives and tone guidelines.

For a business of one to ten people, you already have one. It is how you talk. The work is not developing a voice, it is not replacing the one you have with a worse one borrowed from a corporate template.

If several people post, the useful version of a voice guide is one page: write like you are explaining it to a customer, be specific, no adjectives about our own quality, no exclamation marks in bulk. That is enough to keep things coherent without turning anybody into a robot.

The test

Read the caption out loud before posting.

If you would feel ridiculous saying it to an actual person, rewrite it. If it sounds like something you might genuinely say, post it.

This single test catches almost everything. The corporate register is physically uncomfortable to speak aloud, which is a reliable signal that nobody wants to read it either.

Why this is worth the attention

Your captions are one of the few places where being small is an advantage rather than a limitation.

A large company cannot write “that one was a nightmare, the previous guy had run the pipe through a joist.” It has to go through approval, get sanded down, and emerge as “our team resolved a complex installation challenge.” Their scale forces the generic voice on them.

You are not forced into it. You are choosing it, usually by accident, by imitating businesses whose constraints are not yours.

Stop doing that and you sound like a person who knows what they are doing, in a feed full of businesses that all sound like the same press release. That is not a small differentiator. It costs nothing, it requires no skill you do not already have, and it is available immediately.

Write it the way you would say it. Then stop.

Length, and when to say more

Most captions should be short. Two to four sentences covers the majority.

But there is a category worth writing at length, and businesses underuse it: the post where something genuinely interesting happened.

If you found something unusual behind a wall, solved a problem three other people failed to solve, or made a decision that saved the customer significant money, that is worth six or eight sentences. Tell it properly, as a story, with the problem first.

Those posts consistently outperform short ones, for the obvious reason that there is something to read. The mistake is not writing long captions. It is writing long captions with nothing in them.

So: short by default, long when there is a story. Never long because you felt a post should be substantial.

Writing for the person who does not know you

One adjustment worth making, because it is the most common blind spot.

You are usually writing as though the reader knows what you do. They frequently do not. Somebody who arrived from a search, or who was sent your page by a friend, may not know what trade you are in, let alone what a soffit is.

Two habits fix this without dumbing anything down.

Name the trade occasionally. Not every post, but often enough that a stranger scrolling ten posts works out what you do.

Explain jargon in passing. Not a definition, just a clause. “Replaced the sill, which is the timber that sits under the window and takes all the water.” One extra clause, no condescension, and now the post works for everyone.

This is the difference between a feed that makes sense to your peers and one that makes sense to your customers. A surprising number of trade accounts are unintentionally written for other people in the trade.

The one place a call to action belongs

I said to stop after the information, and mostly that is right. Here is the exception.

When you have actual availability, say so plainly. “Got a gap the week after next if anyone needs anything.” That is useful information rather than a generic ask, and it converts, because it is specific and time bound and it gives somebody who has been meaning to call a reason to do it now.

Compare that to “Contact us today to learn more about our services!” appended to every post, which is not information and which everyone has learned to skip.

Ask when you have something to ask about. The rest of the time, just show the work and let it do the arguing.

---

This article contains no statistics. Where numbers appear elsewhere on this site, they are measured with free public tools or cited to a named source.

Most small businesses treat a finished job as one post. Photo of the result, caption saying it is finished, done.

That is one piece of content from what was probably several days of work containing a dozen genuinely interesting moments. It is an enormous waste, and it is the reason people run out of things to post while doing plenty of things worth posting about.

A single project, documented properly, is about two weeks of material. Here is how to get it out.

The capture rule that makes this possible

None of what follows works retroactively. You cannot go back and photograph the before, or the middle, or the problem you found behind the wall. The material either got captured or it did not.

So the prerequisite is a rule rather than a decision: photograph at four fixed moments on every job. Arrival, during, any problem you uncover, and completion. Ten seconds each. No judgment about whether it will be useful, because you cannot tell at the time and judgment costs energy you do not have at the end of a shift.

Everything below assumes those four moments exist.

The ten

1. The before. Just the starting condition, described plainly. Post it while the job is live, which also demonstrates that you are currently working.

2. The problem you found. Almost every job contains a surprise. The thing behind the wall, the previous repair done badly, the reason it failed. This is consistently the most interesting content a trade business produces, because it shows diagnosis rather than just labour.

3. The decision. You chose an approach. There was an alternative, probably cheaper or faster, and you did not take it. Explaining that choice demonstrates judgment more effectively than any claim about experience.

4. The process shot. Mid work. People genuinely do not know what your job involves and are more interested than you would expect.

5. The detail. The join, the finish, the part you spent extra time on that nobody will ever see. This is where standards get demonstrated instead of claimed.

6. The tool or material. What you used and why that one. Quietly establishes expertise.

7. The finished result. The obvious one. Still worth posting properly rather than as an afterthought.

8. The before and after together. Not the same as posting them separately. The comparison is the argument, and it lands differently side by side.

9. The customer’s reaction. A review, a quoted message with permission, or just what they said when they saw it. Third party validation attached to work people can see.

10. The revisit. Months later, still holding up. Evidence of durability is otherwise nearly impossible to demonstrate and it costs one photograph.

That is ten distinct pieces from one job, with no repetition, all true, all from material that took under a minute total to capture.

Reformatting, which multiplies it again

Each of those can exist in more than one form without becoming duplicate content.

A photo post becomes a short caption on Instagram, a slightly longer version on Facebook where the audience reads more, and an update on your Google Business Profile where somebody is actively considering you.

A problem you found becomes a post now, and later a paragraph in a longer article about common failures in your trade.

Several process shots become one carousel or a short video with no commentary.

The work is in noticing and capturing. Redistribution is close to free.

Pacing it

Do not post ten times about one job in one week. Spread them.

A workable rhythm: during the job, post the before and one process shot. Around completion, post the finished result and the before and after. Over the following fortnight, post the problem, the decision and the detail. Later, the customer reaction. Months on, the revisit.

That spreads one job across six weeks while other jobs overlap into the same rotation. Two or three documented projects running at once and you will have more material than slots, which is the position you want to be in.

What this does that filler cannot

There is a reason to prefer this approach beyond convenience.

Every one of those ten posts is specific and true. It refers to an actual place, an actual problem, an actual decision. That specificity is what makes content persuasive, and it is exactly what generic content lacks.

A post saying “we take pride in quality workmanship” is unverifiable and identical to every competitor. A photo of a repair you made behind a wall, explaining why the previous one failed, makes the same claim in a way the reader can actually evaluate.

You are not making an argument about being good. You are supplying evidence and letting the reader conclude it. That is a substantially stronger position and it requires no marketing skill at all, only documentation.

The objection

The usual pushback is that customers do not want to see this much about one job.

They do not follow along like an audience, and that is fine, because that is not the mechanism. What actually happens is that somebody hears about you, looks you up, and scrolls thirty seconds of your account. What they see is a business visibly doing real work, with detail, recently.

The volume is not for the loyal follower. It is for the stranger doing a thirty second check, and for the algorithm deciding whether your account is worth showing to anyone.

The whole thing in three lines

Capture at four moments on every job, as a rule. Keep them in one folder. Spend half an hour a fortnight turning the folder into posts.

The material problem disappears permanently, and it disappears because you stopped trying to invent content and started recording work you were doing anyway.

Getting permission without making it awkward

You need the customer’s agreement for anything identifiable, and the timing makes it easy.

Ask at the start, not the end. “I usually take a few photos of the work for our website, is that alright?” Almost everybody says yes, and asking up front means you are free to capture as you go rather than negotiating at the end when you are packing up.

Some will ask you not to show the address or the front of the property. That is easy to work around and it is worth confirming what is off limits at the same time.

For significant jobs, put a line in your quote or terms covering photography. Then it is settled in writing and you never have the conversation again.

What to do when the job is not photogenic

Not every trade produces images worth looking at. Plenty of good work is invisible, inside a wall, or simply dull to look at.

For those businesses the same ten step approach works with description instead of photography.

The problem you found, written as three sentences. The decision you made and the alternative you rejected. The detail nobody sees. The customer’s reaction. The revisit months later.

All of these work as text. A short, specific account of a problem and its solution outperforms a mediocre photograph, and it is available to every business regardless of how visual the work is.

The format that works: what the situation was, what you did, what happened afterwards. No adjectives about quality. The specifics carry it.

The economics of this

Worth stating plainly, because it reframes what documentation is.

The capture costs about a minute per job, spread across four ten second moments. The batching costs half an hour a fortnight. That is roughly fifteen hours a year.

For fifteen hours you get a permanent archive that feeds your social accounts, your Google profile, your website proof page, and your quotes. The same material serves every one of those surfaces with no additional work.

Compare that to producing content from scratch each week for the same surfaces, which is the alternative most businesses default into and which is what makes people say they have nothing to post.

The material was always there. The only question is whether somebody photographed it before packing up the van.

Picking which jobs to document heavily

Not every job deserves ten posts. Some deserve one and some deserve none.

The ones worth full documentation share a few traits. There was a problem worth explaining. The transformation is visible. The job is representative of work you want more of. The customer is happy and agreeable about photographs.

That last criterion is the one people underuse. Document the work you want more of, not the work you happen to be doing. If half your income comes from emergency callouts and you would rather do planned installations, document the installations disproportionately. Your feed is a signal about what you do, and people ask for what they see.

A rough ratio that works: one job a month documented thoroughly, everything else captured lightly in case it turns out to be useful. That produces more material than you can post while keeping the effort trivial.

---

This article contains no statistics. Where numbers appear elsewhere on this site, they are measured with free public tools or cited to a named source.

There is a specific kind of frustration that comes from being genuinely good at something and watching worse operators get the work.

It is not imaginary and it is not usually about price. It happens because being good at a thing and being able to show that you are good at a thing are two entirely separate skills, and almost nobody has both by accident.

The businesses I see struggling with this are rarely bad at their jobs. They are bad at documentation. Those are extremely different problems and they get treated as the same one.

The evidence problem

Think about what a potential customer can actually verify about you before they hire you.

They cannot assess your technical skill. They cannot inspect your workmanship. They cannot evaluate your judgment, your reliability, or whether you clean up after yourself. All of the things that actually make you good are invisible to somebody who has not hired you yet.

What they can see is evidence. Photographs. Reviews. Descriptions of work. Before and after comparisons. Other people’s accounts of what it was like to deal with you.

So the question is not “am I good.” The question is “what evidence exists, and where is it.”

For a lot of skilled tradespeople, makers and small operators, the honest answer is that the evidence exists mainly in the heads of people who already hired them, and nowhere else. Which is fine as long as those people keep talking, and useless the moment somebody wants to check for themselves.

The three reasons good work goes undocumented

You were busy doing it. This is the big one and it is not a character flaw. The moment when the job looks best is the moment you are finishing it, tired, wanting to pack up and go home. Nobody feels like staging a photograph then. So you leave, and the work is finished and beautiful and completely unrecorded.

It does not feel remarkable to you. This is the subtle one. Work that took real skill often looks unremarkable to the person who did it, because they know how it should look and this looks correct. The customer, who has no idea how it should look, is frequently amazed. The gap between those two reactions means the work most worth showing often feels least worth showing to the person who made it.

I see this constantly with skilled people. Ask them for their best work and they show you the unusual one, the technically difficult one, the one that gave them trouble. The one that would actually sell is the ordinary job done cleanly, because that is what most customers are buying and what most of them are worried about getting wrong.

Nobody set up a habit. Documentation is not a talent, it is a routine. Businesses that have good evidence usually have a small dull system, and businesses that do not usually have good intentions.

What decent evidence actually looks like

The bar is much lower than people assume, and aiming too high is a common reason nothing gets done.

You do not need professional photography. You need daylight, a clean frame, and a phone. Photograph near a window or outdoors, avoid harsh midday sun, and clear the clutter out of shot first, because a camera records mess that your eye has learned to ignore. Take fifteen and keep three.

You do not need a portfolio site. You need somewhere the photos exist. Your Google Business Profile, a social account, a page on your site. Google profile photos in particular get seen far more than most business owners realize, and uploading them costs nothing.

You do need before and after, more than you need anything else. A finished result is pleasant. A finished result next to what it looked like before is an argument. For any business that improves, repairs, cleans or transforms something, the before photograph is the most valuable image you will ever take, and it has to be taken at the least convenient possible moment, which is why it so rarely exists.

Set a rule: no work starts until somebody has taken the before shot. It takes eleven seconds and it is the difference between showing a nice photo and demonstrating value.

Written evidence counts too

Photographs suit visible work. Plenty of good work is not visible, and for those businesses the evidence has to be described rather than shown.

The format that works is boringly simple and it is roughly: what the situation was, what you did, what happened afterward. Three or four sentences. No adjectives about excellence.

“Customer had a persistent leak two other plumbers had failed to locate. Traced it to a cracked joint behind a kitchen wall, opened a small access panel rather than the full wall, repaired and made good. Half a day, no tiling replacement needed.”

That paragraph does more work than any amount of copy about dedication and quality service. It contains specifics, it demonstrates judgment, and it quietly says two things the customer cares about most: I find the actual problem, and I do not create more damage than necessary.

Nobody reads mission statements. Everybody reads a specific story about a problem like theirs.

Reviews are evidence you can request

The most persuasive evidence is other people saying it, and most businesses have far fewer reviews than their volume of happy customers would suggest, for the straightforward reason that they never ask.

Ask at the moment the customer says something nice. Not a week later, not in a mass email. Right then, while they are actually pleased. Make it one tap by using the short review link rather than sending them hunting.

And respond to every review you get, including the difficult ones. The reply to a negative review is not for the person who wrote it. It is for the next twenty people who read it, and what they are checking is whether you are the kind of business that gets defensive.

Building the habit without it becoming a job

The system that works for busy people has three parts and no more.

Capture, always. One before photo and one after photo on every job. Not a decision each time, a rule. Decisions cost energy at the end of a long day and the energy is not there. Rules do not.

A single place to put things. One folder, one album, one shared drive. If capturing is easy and filing is hard, you will end up with thousands of photos on a phone and no ability to find any of them.

A small, fixed publishing slot. Half an hour, once a fortnight, in the calendar. Pull the best few from the folder, write two sentences on each, post them where people look. This is the step that turns a photo library into evidence.

That is the entire system. It is unglamorous and it works, and it works specifically because it does not require anybody to feel inspired.

The reframe worth taking away

If you are good at your work and it is not translating into business, the instinct is to conclude that you need marketing, and the word “marketing” makes a lot of skilled people feel slightly ill.

Try a different frame. You are not marketing. You are documenting. You are creating a record of work you already did, which already went well, for customers who were already happy.

Nothing about that requires you to be salesy, to exaggerate, or to become somebody you are not. You are not making a claim. You are producing evidence for a claim that is already true and is currently unprovable to anyone who has not met you.

That is a smaller, more honest, and much more achievable job than “doing marketing,” and for most good businesses it is the entire gap between the reputation they have earned and the one strangers can see.

Take the before photo. It costs eleven seconds and it is the whole thing.

Permission, and the thing people worry about

Two objections come up whenever I suggest documenting work, and both deserve straight answers.

“Do I need to ask the customer?” For anything on private property, or anything identifiable, yes, and it is easier than people expect. Asking at the start rather than the end works best: “I usually take a few photos of finished work for our website, is that alright with you?” Almost everybody says yes. Some will ask you not to show the address or the exterior, which is easy to accommodate.

Get it in writing if the job is significant. A line in your quote or terms covering photography saves the awkward conversation entirely.

“Isn’t this showing competitors how I work?” Occasionally, marginally. In practice your competitors already know how the work is done, because they do it too. The people learning something new from your photos are customers, and they are the audience that matters.

The businesses that hoard their methods and show nothing are not protecting an advantage. They are just invisible, while the ones who show their work get the calls.

What to do with the archive once you have it

A folder of photographs is raw material, not a result. Three things to do with it.

Feed the profile and the feed. The steady drip discussed above.

Build one page of proof. A single page on your site showing eight to twelve pieces of real work, each with two sentences. Not a sprawling gallery. A curated set that answers “are these people any good.” This page will outperform your about page substantially and almost nobody has one.

Attach it to quotes. When you send a quote for a job, include two photographs of similar work you have done. This costs nothing and it changes the character of the document from a price to a proposal.

That last one is the highest return use of an archive and it is the one businesses almost never make. A quote with evidence attached competes on something other than the number at the bottom.

---

This article contains no statistics. Where numbers appear elsewhere on this site, they are measured with free public tools or cited to a named source.